Make your brand the answer, not just another link
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) is the discipline that optimizes a company’s content to be identified, understood, and cited by artificial intelligence assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Perplexity when answering user queries. Unlike traditional SEO, which seeks to rank in a list of links, AEO aims to make the brand a direct part of the AI-generated answer.
What does our AEO service include?
Our process
AI presence diagnosis
Competitive gap analysis
Entity consistency
Citable content
External corroboration
Monitoring and adjustment
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) optimizes content so that artificial intelligence assistants—such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, or Copilot—use it as a source when building their answers. The difference from SEO lies in the objective: SEO competes for a ranking within a list of links, while AEO competes to be inside the answer itself. In SEO, success is a click; in AEO, it can be a mention without a click that still influences the user’s decision.
Through a prompt audit. A set of questions that a real client would ask is built—provider comparisons, category recommendations, inquiries about prices or requirements—and systematically executed in each engine, documenting if the brand appears, its position within the response, the description used, and the sources cited by the model. This initial measurement is the baseline against which future results are compared.
Today, there is no advertising format that allows buying a mention inside an AI-generated answer, as happens with Google Ads. Presence is earned organically: citable content, consistent brand information across all public sources, and mentions on sites that models consider reliable. It is an evolving space, and some platforms have already announced advertising formats, but it is wise to distrust anyone currently offering guaranteed paid insertion in AI responses.
Content that is easy to extract and easy to verify. In practice: direct definitions in the first sentence, concrete data with an identifiable source, question-and-answer structures, lists and comparative tables, and pages that cover a single topic in-depth rather than touching lightly on many. Promotional, ambiguous, or adjective-heavy content is rarely cited because it provides no factual statement that the model can reproduce.
Yes. AEO is built upon the same technical and content foundation: if the site is not crawled well, lacks structured data, or has no external authority, there is nothing to optimize. That is why both services are often executed together. That said, you do not have to wait to “finish” SEO: much of the AEO work—restructuring key pages in Q&A format, implementing schema markup, unifying brand information—also improves organic performance.
Timelines are less predictable than in SEO because they depend on cycles we cannot control: the frequency with which each model updates its search index or training base. Engines with live search capabilities (Perplexity, ChatGPT with browsing, Gemini) can reflect changes in weeks if the content is well-indexed and backed by external mentions. Changes incorporated into a model’s foundational knowledge base take considerably longer.
It is a proposed standard—a text file in the domain’s root directory that summarizes site content and highlights the most relevant pages for language models. Its implementation is cheap and harmless. However, it is important to be honest about expectations: no major AI provider has officially confirmed using it as a ranking signal. It is a low-cost bet, not a deciding factor, and does not replace the fundamental work of structure, authority, and consistency.
It is a strategic decision with a direct trade-off: if you block GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, or Google-Extended, your content stops feeding those systems, but you also lose the chance to be mentioned by them. For a media outlet that relies on advertising, this might make sense; for a company that wants to be recommended as a provider, it is usually counterproductive. The standard recommendation is to allow crawling and compete for citations.
Correct the source, do not argue with the model. Errors usually stem from outdated or contradictory information spread across the web: un-updated directory listings, old profiles, mismatched data between your website and LinkedIn, or press releases with figures that are no longer valid. The job is to unify the information across all properties you control, correct third-party listings where possible, and publish authoritative content establishing the correct version. Some platforms also offer direct reporting channels.
With four key indicators. Coverage: what percentage of the monitored prompts feature the brand. Position: whether it is mentioned first or among the last options. Accuracy: whether the model’s description is correct and favorable. Citation: whether the engine links to the domain as a source. In addition, there is an indirect but measurable metric in GA4: referral traffic coming from AI platform domains.
Who is this service for?
Companies that want to stay ahead of a search behavior shift already underway: users asking an AI assistant directly instead of searching on Google. This is especially relevant for professional services, technology, healthcare, and finance, where trust in the source is decisive.